The BAN Report 2/11/21
The BAN Report: PPP Update / Loan Growth? / Remote for Much of 2021? / Remote Boomtown / The Peloton Story / The 9MM Brooklyn Multi-Family Relationship-2/11/21
Through Sunday, about $101 billion in PPP loans have been approved for PPP Round 2. The SBA’s presentation had a few noteworthy highlights:
- $93 billion of the $101 billion in approvals have been to second draw loans. We suspect that this is due to the fact that most first draw eligible buyers were identified last year.
- A little over half of the loans were for depository institutions with less than $10 billion in assets.
- Average overall loan size is $78K, which is smaller than the average of last year’s program at approximately $107K.
- Top lenders so far are Chase, Bank of America and Itria Ventures, LLC. Itria Ventures is an affiliate of biz2credit.
A hurdle so far for lenders has been error codes, which prevent banks from processing PPP loans. These error codes have been the result of efforts to root out some of the fraudulent loans originated last year.
The Small Business Administration has announced a series of steps to address a nagging problem with error codes that Paycheck Protection Program lenders claim are needlessly delaying the approval of thousands of loans.
In perhaps its biggest step to remedy an issue that has dogged the program for weeks, the SBA said on Wednesday that it would permit lenders to certify borrowers whose loans are impacted by validation errors to hasten their receipt of funds.
The agency also said it would allow lenders to upload supporting documents for loans hit by the error messages.
Relief can’t come soon enough for many PPP lenders.
Error codes emerged as a leading bone of contention for shortly after lending resumed on Jan. 12. In the weeks immediately following the program’s relaunch, the codes interrupted the processing of as many as 30% of the loans submitted for approval.
Attached is the new SBA procedural notice to address the issues with error codes.
2020 was a bad year for loan growth at banks, as loan growth shrank for the first time in a decade and just the second decline in 28 years.
Large U.S. lenders saw their loan books shrink in 2020 for the first time in more than a decade, according to an analysis of Federal Reserve data by Jason Goldberg, a banking analyst at Barclays. The 0.5% drop was just the second decline in 28 years.
Bank of America Corp.’s loans and leases dropped by 5.7%. Citigroup Inc.’s loans dropped by 3.4% and Wells Fargo & Co.’s shrank by 7.8%. Among the biggest four banks, only JPMorgan Chase & Co. had more loans at the end of the year than the start.
Lenders are flush with cash that they want to put to use, and executives say they are hopeful loan growth will pick up in 2021. Brisk lending typically suggests there is enough momentum in the economy to give companies and consumers the confidence to borrow. But the current weakness suggests questions remain about the vigor of the economic recovery.
For banks, this weighed on profit. Net interest income, the spread between what banks charge borrowers and pay depositors, fell 5% across the industry last year—a consequence of shrinking loan portfolios and near-zero interest rates. It was the biggest drop in more than 80 years of record-keeping, according to research by Mike Mayo, a banking analyst at Wells Fargo.
At the start of last year, it didn’t look like this would happen. When the pandemic first hit, big companies rushed to draw down credit lines from their banks, fearful they wouldn’t be able to raise money from investors in the bond market. The loans on bank balance sheets spiked.
Loan books would have shrunk more if not for government support for small businesses. Banks doled out hundreds of billions of dollars in loans through the Paycheck Protection Program. Those loans have stacked up on bank balance sheets, but are slowly being whittled away as the government forgives them.
For the regional and community banks, a disproportionate of loan growth came from PPP, much of which will have run off by the end of the year as these loans eventually get forgiven. Banks are flush with cash, but how do you prudently underwrite new loans in this environment when so many borrowers had choppy 2020s and would be struggling if it were not for unprecedented government intervention? The bond market seems to be picking up the slack.
The average yield on U.S. junk bonds dropped below 4% for the first time ever as investors seeking a haven from ultra-low interest rates keep piling into an asset class historically known for its high yields.
The measure for the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High-Yield index dipped to 3.96% on Monday evening, making it six straight sessions of declines.
Yield-hungry investors have been gobbling up junk bonds as an alternative to the meager income offered in less-risky bond markets. Demand for the debt has outweighed supply by so much that some money managers are even calling companies to press them to borrow instead of waiting for deals to come their way. A majority of new issues, even those rated in the riskiest CCC tier of junk, have been hugely oversubscribed.
Banks are simply acting more prudently than their Wall Street brethren, who seem to be able to issue debt for any company, even those with the worst financial prospects. If AMC can issue debt despite as poor prospects as any public company, anyone can. Chesapeake Energy, after emerging from bankruptcy recently, issued bonds this week at 5.875% with yields in the mid-4s with over $2 billion in orders before its $1 billion launch Tuesday. Perhaps, banks are better off accepting limited loan growth than chasing loan growth.
Remote for Much of 2021?
The long-delayed return to offices keeps getting pushed further back, and some are now seeing returns in the late summer / early fall.
From Silicon Valley to Tennessee to Pennsylvania, high hopes that a rapid vaccine rollout in early 2021 would send millions of workers back into offices by spring have been scuttled. Many companies are pushing workplace return dates to September—and beyond—or refusing to commit to specific dates, telling employees it will be a wait-and-see remote-work year.
The delays span industries. Qurate Retail Inc., the parent company of brands such as Ballard Designs, QVC and HSN, recently shifted its planned May return to offices in the Philadelphia area, Atlanta and other cities until September at the earliest. TechnologyAdvice, a marketing firm in Nashville, initially told employees to plan on Feb. 1 as their return date. The company then pushed the date back to August. Now, TA has decided it will begin a hybrid in-office schedule in the fall of 2021, letting workers choose whether to work remotely or come in, the company says.
Return-to-office dates have shifted so much in the past year that some companies aren’t sharing them with employees. Shipping giant United Parcel Service Inc., based in Atlanta, and financial-services firm Fidelity Investments Inc., based in Boston, haven’t announced return dates, instead telling workers signing on from home that the companies are monitoring the coronavirus pandemic and will call workers back when it is safe.
Nearly a year of makeshift work at home has weighed on employees, leaders say. While many companies say productivity is up, executives worry that creativity is suffering and say that burnout is on the rise. Even so, bosses struggle to say when things will change.
Current office-occupancy rates are highest in parts of the country where large school districts have reopened, according to data from Kastle Systems, a security firm that monitors access-card swipes in more than 2,500 office buildings, from skyscrapers to suburban office campuses.
Right now, that means Texas: In Dallas, Austin and Houston, major school districts have offered in-person learning for many months, and offices are roughly 35% full, according to Kastle. By comparison, in New York City, where schools are open part-time for in-person learning, office occupancy is less than 15%.
While we believe that some employees function well remotely, there are others it is bad for, especially young workers who are missing out in-person training and mentorship and management teams. Management teams usually function better when they see each other on a regular basis. But, visiting a downtown office building right now is like going to the airport, so many would rather work remotely until its both safe and convenient to go to the office.
As working remote continues, many workers are fleeing to smaller cities with cheaper rents and outdoor amenities. Bozeman, Montana is one of them.
For the white-collar worker fleeing a pandemic-ravaged metropolis, Bozeman has a lot to offer. The Montana city of just under 50,000 is an hour’s drive from the award-winning Big Sky ski resort, and local businesses like the Rocking R Bar and Cactus Records radiate small-town charm. The one thing newcomers won’t be able to escape: big-city prices.
The average rent for a 2-bedroom apartment in Bozeman hit $2,050 a month in early February, a 58% surge from a year earlier, according to rental site Zumper. The cost of a home also jumped by almost 50%, fueled in part by an influx of office types who switched to remote work when cities locked down — and ultimately decided to relocate when it became clear they wouldn’t go back any time soon. “People who can afford it are buying housing sight unseen and driving the cost of housing up,” says Amanda Diehl, a Bozeman native who returned in 2018 and now runs Sky Oro, a women-focused coworking space.
For Bozeman residents, however, the frenzy has made their plight more acute. The cost of living is more than 20% higher than the national average, while the median income is about 20% lower, limiting buying power in a market crowded with flush out-of-towners. More housing is coming: According to the city, a handful of new neighborhoods have recently broken ground and apartments are going up downtown. But locals are still getting squeezed out.
“We have such low vacancy rates, that if they lose a rental, there’s literally no other place to go,” says Heather Grenier, who runs a local nonprofit focused on housing and poverty called the Human Resources Development Council. The Bozeman boom has fueled an “incredible increase” in the local homeless population, as well as a spate of pop-up RV communities for those who’ve been displaced, according to Grenier. “This work was challenging before, but feels impossible now.”
Of course, this is creating its own set of problems – a lack of affordable housing for one. Other places, like much of West Virginia, see an opportunity to capture from the remote trend.
The pandemic, for all its pain, has hastened a number of trends that could aid West Virginia. It has driven a shift toward telehealth, a vital tool in rural communities. It has pushed more consumers into outdoor recreation, a market West Virginia’s scenic gorges and mountain trails are primed to capture. It has boosted political will in the state to prioritize broadband. And the pandemic has sped up a move toward remote work to parts of the country with a more affordable cost of living.
This last trend, which is tied to the other three, could have broad consequences for how states think about economic development. If more workers can live anywhere, states don’t have to throw tax breaks at companies to attract them. They can try to attract workers directly.
“Making a place a good place to live becomes much more important now,” said Adam Ozimek, the chief economist at the freelance platform Upwork. “That’s also a much healthier type of competition than who’s going to give the Bass Pro outlet the biggest tax cut.”
Many people grow up in rural communities and are forced to leave to find good jobs in larger cities. If the remote work trend becomes a permanent phenomenon, it does open up the appeal of affordable places with good quality of life and abundant outdoor recreation. Due to Senator Manchin’s status as the key swing vote in a 50/50 Senate, states like West Virginia could see huge federal investments in broadband, which allows these communities to compete more effectively for remote workers.
The Peloton Story
Fortune had a great story on Peloton’s rapid ascent, as they interviewed four of their five cofounders. A key takeaway is just how difficult it can be to raise capital for a start-up.
Foley: This is important for the founder story. I had a vision and recruited these guys. Within a couple months, I was no longer involved in creating Peloton as you know it. I thought of something, and these guys took it, ran with it, and built it while I was gone. I was on the road for two or three years with a PowerPoint trying to raise money, very much ineffectively.
Cortese: The noes were all stupid. They would be things like, “Oh, well, this doesn’t fit our portfolio thesis.” Or, “No, we don’t like that you have a hardware component. We only think Facebook-style software is going to work.” It’s like, “Are you guys idiots?” Most of these pieces were things that existed in the world—the bike, video streaming. Our job was to bring them together. It’s not like we were inventing a stationary bike from scratch.
Let’s finish off with a lightning round. When was the moment you realized this thing was actually going to work?
Cortese: 2013, Black Friday. Me, John, and others were standing in the Short Hills mall [in N.J.], which was supposed to be a pop-up store. We had the first six bikes we ever made. The only six bikes we had ever made. We put them in that store just to get it open. We were standing there when, all of a sudden, people started coming in. By the end of the day, I think we sold four to six bikes. We went out and celebrated like it was a million bikes. I remember thinking like, “Holy shit, people get it. We’ve got a business.”
Angela Duckworth wrote a great book called Grit, which I highly recommend, which talks about how grit, not talent, determines who succeeds and fails. The Peloton founders had grit, and plowed on after several years of rejection and now are growing at an exponential rate since the pandemic.
The 9MM Brooklyn Multi-Family Portfolio
Clark Street Capital’s Bank Asset Network (“BAN”) proudly presents: “The 9MM Brooklyn Multi-Family Relationship.” This exclusively offered relationship is offered for sale by one institution (“Seller”). Highlights Include:
- A total outstanding balance of $8,702,589
- The loan is secured by 1st mortgages on both a multi-family building and a mixed-use property located in Brooklyn, NY
- The vast majority of the 36 units in both properties are occupied
- The relationship is non-performing with a court-ordered sale, an in-place receiver, and bankruptcy stay relief
- Sale announcement: February 4, 2021
- Due Diligence Materials Available Online: Monday, February 8, 2021
- Indicative Bid Date: Thursday, February 25, 2021
- Closing Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021